Does organizing intelligence underlie reality, or is materialism correct? We don't claim to know— but we're building the platform to investigate rigorously, recovering ancient "Know Thyself" methodology with modern tools.
Humanity has debated for millennia: Does consciousness/intelligence/divinity organize reality, or is materialism correct?
Materialists say: Consciousness is neurons firing. No organizing intelligence. Ancient wisdom was primitive ignorance.
Fundamentalists say: Have faith, don't question. Ancient texts are literally true because they say so.
Both claim certainty. Both dismiss evidence that challenges their worldview. Both have stopped investigating.
Patterns, fine-tuning, interconnection suggest underlying consciousness. Ancient traditions accessed genuine insights.
Apparent patterns are coincidence. Ancient convergences are cultural transmission. Consciousness purely emergent.
We test both hypotheses honestly. Evidence leads, not ideology.
Full transparency: SOL's founders find Hypothesis 1 more compelling based on our study. But we could be wrong—which is exactly why we're building tools to test this properly. Our intuitions don't determine the methodology.
Mystery schools across all traditions understood: Self-knowledge is the foundation of all wisdom.To understand the cosmos, you must first understand consciousness. To comprehend the divine, you must first comprehend your own nature.
This principle appears universally: Greek Mysteries ("Know Thyself"), Kabbalah ("Tselem Elohim"), Vedanta ("Tat Tvam Asi"), Christianity ("The kingdom of God is within you"), Sufism ("He who knows himself knows his Lord"), Buddhism ("Look within, thou art the Buddha").
The path to truth runs through self-knowledge. Understanding consciousness expands your consciousness.
Ancient civilizations possessed profound understanding of consciousness, cosmology, and reality's fundamental nature. Not because we blindly accept their claims—but because patterns in their knowledge warrant systematic investigation.
We commit to testing empirically, reporting transparently, and empowering individual verification. If the evidence doesn't support a claim, we say so. That's how science works.
Design experiments, track patterns, collect data—verify claims through structured investigation
Source all claims, flag biases, disclose limitations—negative results count
You don't have to trust us—test it yourself through dream tracking and pattern analysis
5 levels from Established Fact to Speculative Inquiry—every claim is tagged
NOT for: Dogmatic skeptics who dismiss without investigation. Uncritical believers who accept everything without evidence.
FOR: The intellectually curious middle—people willing to investigate controversial questions with proper methodology. Truth-seekers who sense ancient wisdom holds keys but demand intellectual honesty. Those who practice contemplation and study research. If that's you, you belong here.
Researchers exploring consciousness, archaeology, ancient civilizations, and controversial topics face a critical challenge: traditional funding sources won't support their work. Academic grants avoid "fringe" topics. Private donors want quick ROI. Brilliant minds can't investigate essential questions.
of subscription revenue goes directly to research grants in consciousness, archaeology, and ancient knowledge
Research Contributors vote quarterly on which projects receive funding next
Early access to findings, researcher Q&As, behind-the-scenes updates before anyone else
We investigate controversial topics with rigorous standards. Here's how:
Every claim is tagged with its evidence level:
Source all claims. Flag biases. Disclose conflicts. Negative results published. If we can't find evidence, we say so.
Three modes: Academic (citations, rigor), Balanced (evidence + wisdom), Spiritual (contemplative guidance). Switch anytime.
You don't have to trust us—test it yourself. Track dreams, journal practices, observe patterns. Verify claims through structured self-experimentation.
Agreement across independent paths is how we know we're touching truth.
$8 Research Contributor (12K tokens/month, vote on research projects, exclusive findings access) or $12 Private Standard (10K tokens/month, fully private, no metadata sharing, supports research).
We fund vetted research projects in consciousness studies, archaeological investigation, ancient civilization research, and controversial topics mainstream academia won't touch.
Scientists conduct structured studies. Archaeologists investigate sites. Consciousness researchers test claims. All with transparent methodology and reported results (including negative findings).
Early access to research papers, YouTube content with researchers, progress updates, behind-the-scenes investigations—shared with community before public release.
Research Contributors vote quarterly on which projects receive next funding round. Your participation shapes what gets investigated.
As we launch funded research projects, this section will show real-time impact metrics.
Total Research Funding
Updates monthly as projects launch
Active Research Projects
First project launching Q1 2026
Research Papers Published
Findings shared with community first
Atheists say there's no god. Believers say there is. We say: Let's test it—together.Not to blindly believe, but to investigate rigorously with transparent methodology and individual verification.
No credit card required • Cancel anytime • 14-day free trial